The Causes:
With the advent of capitalism and inception of new economic structures a couple of decades ago, social responsibilities were long foregone and only products that sold well were promoted by the society as whole, which includes both the producer and the consumer. In my opinion, conservative economics have been responsible for ignoring education on state level. The conservative economics, fueled by the work of Adam Smith introduced the concept of free markets (Carson, Thomas, & Hecht, 2005, pp. 10-15).
In free markets the forces of demand and supply determine what to be produced, how it should be produced and for whom it should be produced. Something that is desirable by the general public is produced, and it does not matter that it is good or not, as long as it is in demand. What we saw in the last three decades was widespread growth all over the western world as everything including all types of markets was gradually highly deregulated. These deregulations yielded good results in the beginning because there were so many unutilized resources, however devastating some societal concerns.
There are two reasons for the current dismal state of education in Peterborough which I think is caused by the kind of economics and corporate governance practiced in the last decades. Education and some other basic necessities of life can not to be provided by private institutions because private market forces are only focusing on profit maximization and not on promoting things which are good and necessary to sustain in future.
随着资本主义和新的经济结构在几十年前开始出现，社会责任是长的已知只有产品，畅销的社会作为一个整体提升，其中包括生产者和消费者。在我看来，保守的经济政策一直负责无视国家级教育。保守的经济，由亚当史密斯的工作推动了自由市场的概念（卡森，托马斯，与赫克特，2005，pp. 10-15）。
在自由市场的需求和供给的力量，确定如何产生，如何生产和为谁应该产生。这是可取的普通公众所产生，且不说它是好还是不好的事情，只要是在需求。我们在过去三年所看到的是普遍的增长在整个西方世界都包括所有类型的市场逐渐非常放松管制。这些反常的取得了良好的结果，在开始的时候，因为有太多的未使用的资源，但破坏性的一些社会问题。
有两方面的原因，当前教育的低迷状态在彼得堡，我认为这是由一种经济学和公司治理在过去的几十年的实践造成的。教育和一些生活基本必需品无法由私人机构因为私人市场的力量只关注利润最大化而不是促进东西是好的，要维持在未来。
