Assignment First

爱尔兰研究学论文代写:法律

在亲自到法庭访问时,感觉是新颖和充满的。法官正在听取大约40年前发生的性侵犯刑事案件的处理。案件的主要判决是法官撤销了对所要求的诉讼程序的永久居留的上诉,并下令上诉许可,并永久保留区法院作出的决定。这个过程非常简单。被告检察官有时反驳,情况有时也变得情绪化。检察官会向他的客户和他的对手提出问题,然后由对手检察官接管沉默,提出他的观点。由于本案和其他不服法院判决而上诉的案件,有待上级法院进一步上诉。许多上诉来自下级法院,如果上诉一直上诉到高等法院,最高法院的上诉将被视为国家法律的问题。然而,这个法院的裁决与Feeley对下级法院的描述混淆不清,而且大多数人拥挤。这也表明,低等法院在世界不同地区可能有不同的运作体系。这是因为有些法院采取了更加程序化的方法,正确听取和审理过去的案件历史和决定,而其他一些法院则只是对案件进行总结并作出判断。知道阅读案例摘要和阅读整个案例史可能会对案件的结果和判决产生深远的影响,这是令人惊讶的。

爱尔兰研究学论文代写:法律

On personally visiting a court room, the feeling was new and elative. The judge was listening to the proceeding of a criminal case involving sexual assault which actually happened some 40 years earlier. The case was about the principal judgement where the judge quashed the appeal for a permanent stay on the proceedings sought, and ordered the leave of appeal and stayed the decision taken by the District court permanently. The process was very simple. There was a counter argument by the defendants prosecutor at times, the situations sometimes also turned emotional. The prosecutor would make his point and ask questions to his client and their opponents, which would then follow a silence, taken over by the opponent prosecutor to make his point. Since this case and others cases which have been appealed after not being satisfied with the court decision, do come up for further appeal in higher courts in authority. Many appeals come from lower courts and then go up right up to the High court if the party keeps appealing, and the final appeal in the High court would be considered a question on the country’s law. The finding of this court is however different to Feeley’s description of lower courts being chaotic and mostly crowded. It also indicates that the lower courts may have a different system of operations in different regions of the world. This is because some courts follow a more procedural method of properly hearing and reading past case history and decisions, while others read only the summary of cases and make a judgement on it. It is surprising to know that reading a summary of a case and reading the entire case history may have profound implications on the result and the judgement of the case.