These tensions has been observed to been seen in some specific cases like women having equal rights, personal status laws, religious freedom and strict criminal penalties of Islam for crimes like adultery, robbery and etc (Moussalli, 2001). But, there has been a pattern in case of the theological and intellectual reply to the test of global rights of humans. As the attack of mocking disapprovals of Orientalists in contradiction of the Islamic systems of belief and tradition, there has been a pattern observed which challenges the international human rights.
In modern Islamic culture, the ambiguity one observes associated to a promise to rights of human is because of the letdown to challenge the actual involvements of human rights and Islam (Sachedina, 2001). It was by presumptuous that the involvements should be the same and that the God has rendered the living individuals similar kind of rights which are based in the global rights for human dissertation that the apologetic discourse avoided the issue.
However, it was not because of reconstructing or re-objectifying Islam that this claim was made in order to seek this type of uniformity (Mayer, 2007). Many Muslims didn’t take discourses of human rights adequately serious so as to effectuate this kind of work of the actualized knowledge of Islam in light if the colonial experience and the insight of the massive insincerity in practices of human rights. Thus, it has been seen in many studies that the human rights in Islamic nations aren’t respected as compared to the other parts of the world.