Several authors have published pessimistic views about Agreement on Textiles and Clothing and they concluded that importing countries may fail to carry out their whole commitments as protective measures make it available for those countries to take actions against imports when and if they need. To summarize there was a wide consensus on many textile and clothing trade aspects after the decline of Agreement on Textile and Clothing. Generally the analysts agrees that; 1) After the quota removal in textiles and clothing the global trade grew more quickly; 2) The US imports several of its textiles and clothing from China, ranging from 1/3rd or 2/3rd of its imports; 3) the textile and clothing manufacturers of United States reduces their operations, lay off workers and shut downs their factories due to higher competition from India, China and other suppliers; and 4) One study determines that due to Chinese imports there is around 630,00 losses of jobs; and 5) There is a capability that WTO, US and the EU members may determine remedies of trade in response to development in imports from Asia, India and Chinese suppliers (Raffaelli and Jenkins, 1995).
一些作者已经发表了悲观的看法纺织品与服装协议和他们的结论是，进口的国家可能无法履行其承诺保护措施使其可用于这些国家采取对进口时，如果他们需要行动。总结有许多纺织品和服装贸易方面的纺织品和服装贸易协议衰落之后的一个广泛的共识。一般的分析家同意；1）在纺织品和服装的全球贸易增长更迅速的配额取消后；2）美国进口一些来自中国的纺织品和服装，范围从1 /第三或2 /第三的进口；3）纺织和服装制造商降低其美国业务，裁员和关闭工厂，由于从印度高竞争，中国和其他供应商；4）研究决定，由于中国进口大约有630,00损失的工作；5）有一种能力，WTO，美国和欧盟成员国可以确定在从亚洲进口的发展响应弥补贸易，印度和中国的供应商（1995 Raffaelli和詹金斯，）。
