代寫論文:敵意收購
敵意收購：如上所述，當試圖收購的公司試圖通過除購買簡單性質之外的方法獲得對另一個組織的所有權時發生惡意收購。第一個陷阱是敵對競價。大多數收購敵對性質的產品都包含招標產品。該公司以高於市場價值的成本收購目標公司股權，以向股東招標或向公司股東提出收購目標公司股票的結果。敵意招標的目標在於收購目標公司股票的一半以上，從而在未經董事會批准的情況下奪取目標公司董事的公司所有權（Cartwright et al。，2014）。有時候，敵意收購也會採取代理權爭奪的形式，其中敵意公司的投標人試圖說服更多的股東在投票權範圍內分配股東。另一個缺陷是先發製人的防守。
代寫論文:敵意收購
一種常見的技術是小型企業和公司用來減少敵意收購風險的毒丸。為了製造毒藥，董事會董事通常會導致法律通過，這些法律為股東提供權利，以原價購買更多股票的權利（Stahl et al。，2013）。這種權利只有在新利益相關者獲得特定股票比例時才會觸發。當這種情況發生時，毒藥丸增加了股票數量，導致稀釋持有敵方投標人的股票，並且使敵對公司的投標人通過購買股票來收購目標公司而使其成本高得驚人（Stahl et al。 ，2013）。其他的先發製人措施包括董事會成員選舉令人stag目結舌，導致代理人競爭的持續時間延長，考慮到法律規定需要公司中超過50％的股東需要批准更新的所有者，這使股東變得容易最初導致防止收購。被稱為金色自然降落傘的大型高層管理人員的離職費用也導致阻止對敵意收購。
代寫論文:敵意收購
Hostile Takeover: As discussed above, hostile takeover takes place when a company trying to acquire tries gaining ownership of another organization through methods apart from purchase of straightforward nature. The first pitfall is hostile bidding. Most takeovers of hostile nature are inclusive of tender based offering. The company acquiring results in tendering or making an offer of public nature to shareholders for buying Target Company shares at a cost much high than the value in the market. The goal of hostile bidding lies in acquiring more than half the stock of targeted company resulting henceforth to seize company ownership without target company directors in the board’s approval (Cartwright et al., 2014). At times, hostile takeovers also takes the form of fight of proxy, wherein the bidder of the hostile firm makes an attempt of convincing shareholders in larger number to get it assigned within their rights of voting. Another pitfall is pre-emptive defence.
代寫論文:敵意收購
A common technique is a poison pill that small businesses and corporations utilize for reducing the hostile takeover risk. For creating a poison pill, directors in the board generally result in adopting by laws that provide entitlement to shareholders originally with regard to the right of buying more shares at a price which is discounted (Stahl et al., 2013). Such a right is only triggered when newer stakeholders acquire a particular stock percentage. When this is triggered, the pill of poison enhances the shares number causing to dilute a stock holding for bidders, who are hostile and making it expensive prohibitively for the bidder from hostile firm to acquire the company targeted through purchase of stock (Stahl et al., 2013). Other measures of pre-emptive nature are inclusive of board members election staggering resulting in prolonging proxy based fights, and considering adopting by laws needing that more than 50 percent of the shareholders in a company need to approve newer owners, which make it easy for shareholders originally to result in preventing takeovers. Large packages of severance for top management known as parachutes of golden nature also result in discouraging takeovers that are hostile.
