essay代写：乔纳斯可以据合同或消费者法起诉
在乔纳斯可以起诉谁的情况下，有必要考虑两种不同的情况。现在，根据合同或消费者法，第18条规定，从事贸易或商业活动的人不得误导或欺骗。这里的重点是这个人必须在贸易或商业，但这里不是这样，因为充电器是由一个朋友给乔纳斯的。然而，根据侵权行为法上的疏忽，可以这样说，朋友在赠送一个她不再需要的充电器给乔纳斯时，可能对乔纳斯负有注意义务。乔纳斯可以起诉制造商，因为他也有注意义务。
essay代写 ：乔纳斯可以据合同或消费者法起诉
乔纳斯可以根据《澳大利亚合同法》、《澳大利亚消费者法》第18条为他的伤害寻求赔偿，该条款此前是《2010年竞争与消费者法》(Cth)附表2的一部分。澳大利亚合同法通常是根据普通法制定的，但由于保护消费者的利益，在当今时代又被法律所延伸。这里讨论的问题是误导和/或欺骗行为。如果乔纳斯能够证明卖方的行为当充电器卖给他误导或者卖方是欺骗性的,然后他就可以寻求补救措施根据年代18澳大利亚消费者法律“一个人不能在贸易或商业、参与行为误导或欺骗性的或可能误导或欺骗”(澳大利亚消费者法律,2016)。其次，根据过失侵权法，卖充电器给乔纳斯的人对乔纳斯负有注意义务。因为藉由允许乔纳斯借或买充电器，他们知道他们是危险的。他们违反了注意义务，这意味着乔纳斯可以控告卖充电器给他们的人。充电器的制造商对乔纳斯负有注意义务。
essay代写 ：乔纳斯可以据合同或消费者法起诉
In the case of who Jonas could sue, it is necessary to consider two different situations. Now under the contract or the consumer law, section 18 states that a person in trade or commerce must not mislead or be deceptive. The emphasis here is that the person must be in trade or commerce, but this is not the case here, as the charger was given to Jonas by a friend. However, under the tort law of negligence, it can be said that the friend in giving away a charger that she no longer requires to Jonas might hold a duty of care to Jonas. Jonas can sue the manufacturer who also owes a duty of care.
essay代写 ：乔纳斯可以据合同或消费者法起诉
Jonas could seek compensation for his injury under Australian contract law, under the section 18 of the Australian Consumer law, which was previously part of schedule 2 of Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). Australian contract law is usually established under common law but is extended with statutes in current times for reasons of protecting the consumer. The issue addressed here is misleading and/or deceptive conduct. If Jonas is able to prove that the actions of the seller when selling the charger to him was misleading or if the seller was deceptive, then he would be able to seek remedies under the s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law “A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive” (Australian Consumer Law, 2016). Secondly, under the tort law of negligence, the person who sold the charger to Jonas owes a duty of care to Jonas. Because by allowing Jonas to borrow or buy a charger, they know they are hazardous. They have breached that duty of care, which means Jonas can charge the person who sold the charger to them. The manufacturer of the charger holds the duty of care to Jonas.
