华盛顿论文代写：领导理论
由于时间的推移，一些评论相关的性状的方法在领导的理论提供了意见，这种特殊的方法，在极简单的比较高层次的复杂性，在领导的概念（舍费尔2009）。除了这一点，它已被学者指出的理论与领导的特点的方法通常创建一个专注于事实，如何领导者的有效性可以被认为是追随者，而不是实际的有效性的领导者。由于这一事实，即个人的预测，可以在实际程度上的有效性之间的领导者已经相对保持未开发的（低音2009）的过程。许多学者认为，可以通过人格和预测的能力对工作的表现作出低层次的解释，并不能对可被认为是高效的领导人的选择提供援助。尽管这一特殊的观点，这一概念被批评了很多，因为在过去的几年里，学者们一直在不断研究的影响与人格特质的有效性的领导者（低音2008）。它已经被一些研究人员证明是成功的领导者是不同于其他人，并有足够的能力，具有特定的核心特征的人格。另一个显着的批评所面临的特点方法的领导是事实上，它仍然保持沉默的影响关系的情况下，周围的领导人（玛丽恩2011）。许多研究人员发现，在不同的情况下，扮演领导者角色的人可能无法成为领导者的角色。
华盛顿论文代写：领导理论
Since the passage of time, a number of reviewers related to the theory of trait approach in leadership have provided comments that this particular approach in extremely simplistic in comparison with the high level of complexity in the concept of leadership (Schaefer 2009). In addition to this, it has been noted by the scholars that the theory related to the trait approach of leadership usually creates a focus on the facts as to how the effectiveness of leader can be perceived by the follower instead of the actual effectiveness of leader. Due to the fact that the process by which personal predictions can be made with respect to the actual degree of effectiveness amongst leader has comparatively remained unexplored (Bass 2009). It has been concluded by a number of scholars that there is low level of explanation that can be made over personality and the power of prediction over the performance of job and cannot provide assistance to the organizations for the selection of the leaders that can be considered as being highly effective. Even though this particular perspective with respect to this concept is being criticized a lot since the past few years, scholars have still been continuously studying the effects related to the traits of personality on the effectiveness of leader (Bass 2008). It has been demonstrated by a number of researchers that leaders that are successful are different from other individuals and are capable enough of possessing specific core traits of personality. Another significant criticism faced by the trait approach of leadership is the fact that it remains silent with respect to the influences in relation with the context of situation that surrounds the leaders (Marion 2011). It had been found by a number of researchers that individuals who play the role of leaders in a particular situation might not be capable enough of being a leader within a different situation.
