Assignment First

  本篇論文代筆價錢-慈善用水講了慈善用水可以被定義爲一個非盈利組織,主要是爲新興國家提供清潔和安全的飲用水。該組織成立於2006年,並聲稱已使610多萬人受益。Org 2017)。該組織利用主流媒體和社交媒體平臺來提高人們對其慈善事業的認識(Charitywater)。組織,2017年)。該慈善機構目前在24個國家開展工作。這些是本組織提出的要求。本篇論文代筆價錢文章由英國第一論文 Assignment First輔導網整理,供大家參考閱讀。

  Charity Water can be defined as a non-profit organization that was primarily created to provide clean and safe drinking water to the emerging nations. The organization was founded in the year 2006 and it has claimed to have benefitted over 6.1 million people (Charitywater. Org 2017). The organization uses the mainstream media and social media platforms to create awareness about the charities undertaken by the organization (Charitywater. Org, 2017). The charity is currently working in over 24 nations. These are the claims that is made by the organization.

  The purpose of this analysis to use the Social Value Principle as a formula to evaluate the real impact of the organization. These have been detailed in the following.

  Application of Social Value Principle

  Social Value Principle is the principles that are used for providing the basic building blocks to the entities that want to understand the nuances of the value of the account. This is done to ensure that there is an increase in the equality and to improve the wellbeing of the people. These are some of the general accounting principles (Vickers, 2013). Seven principles are used in this social value to understand the impact of the social accounting principles.

  The first factor that needs to be considered is the stakeholder involvement. In this case, the stakeholders of the organization are the investors, employees and the people who they serve (Vickers, 2013). The company also works with the local organizations and communities to bring real change in the communities. 100% of the funding comes from the private donors such as Michael and Xochi Birch (Charitywater. Org 2017). A number of private donations such as the donations from the Birch family enables the company to sustain. They serve in 24 nations including Ethiopia, Rwanda to name a few.

  Comprehension of Change: The organization chooses a particular location, tries to develop appropriate technology for continuous water supply. It creates a system to bring changes and tries to focus on the perennial supply of water (Charitywater. Org 2017).

  Valuation: The main value method is the creation of sustainability in the local environment where they function. There is detailed mapping and financial statement that are made publicly available for the people to make determination about the different options (Charitywater. Org 2017). There is a separate tab that is shown in the website about the different financial flow.

  Inclusion of the Tangible materials. There are efforts taken by the website to ensure that the real effects of their work are shown in the outcomes (Vickers, 2013). The organization needs to take into account the management and create an account for all these factors. From the analysis, it is evident that the company has provided detailed description of the changes that they had fostered in the communities. The company has stated in their online website that they had completed 3377 projects, where 7128152 people have had access to clean water (Charitywater. Org 2017). They were able to achieve this based on the local partnership. This had enabled the organization to serve in more than 24 countries (Charitywater. Org, 2017). A number of ongoing projects are also mentioned.

  Veracity of the Claims: The claims that are made by the company also have an innate advertising. The efforts made by the company are highlighted. An innate implicit encouragement for the private donors to make contributions for the people is observed while perusing the website (Charitywater. Org, 2017). However, there needs to be more information from the local communities where they had brought changes. Adding multimedia and videos about the recipients would have created more accountability.

  Transparency: The website has all the financial information data that is made available to the public (Charitywater. Org 2017). There is also mapping in the websites as to where they had brought changes. These can be considered as accurate. It can be perceived that clear documentation of the stakeholder involvement, outcomes of the project and the benchmarks are presented. The efforts taken by the company to present the true facts to the people are made apparent. A clarity is observed in the methods of information and the presentation of the facts. These make the findings more credible (Charitywater. Org, 2017).

  Verification of result: This verification is difficult for the individual viewers. To make sure that the claims in the site is true, a lot more resources and accounts of value are required. From analysis based on the website and the organizations effort to portray the truth, it can be alluded that the company wants to bring changes (Charitywater. Org, 2017).