論文代寫費用：泰國與歐共體爭端的原因
隨著全球化的加強，資本和勞動力繼續為其流動找到更少的障礙，貿易關系得到加強。隨著這種強化，隨著市場和國家試圖保護本國企業，並通過征收貿易關稅從國際市場尋求最大利潤，出現了不請自來的爭端。由於各國之間交換的商品、它們的經濟地位和財政狀況總是不平衡的，因此有一些爭端是不可避免的，將繼續迫使世界貿易組織(世貿組織)繼續作為解決這種沖突的中立國方。
論文代寫費用：泰國與歐共體爭端的原因
泰國三大金槍魚罐頭出口夥伴分別是美國、歐盟和加拿大。歐共體與非洲、加勒比和太平洋國家(ACP)簽署了全面的金槍魚罐頭貿易協定，於2000年2月3日批準生效。然而，由於ACP國家對出口到EC的罐裝金槍魚零關稅，泰國受到了EC 24%的進口關稅。這似乎是一種歧視，因為歐共體沒有任何正當和正當的理由來損害依賴金槍魚出口的泰國經濟，特別是當非加太國家沒有受到歐共體的任何關稅時。對泰國的罐裝金槍魚出口征收關稅的舉動是歧視性的，泰國通過談判渠道尋求WTO準則下的支持。
論文代寫費用：泰國與歐共體爭端的原因
泰國利用了世貿組織準則所規定的爭端解決諒解(DSU)，這一程序幫助泰國確保了其正義。民主聯盟黨對該爭端提出調解、調解和中立的看法，泰國要求這種看法，歐共體不得不回到談判桌上來，恢復其歧視性的行動。
論文代寫費用：泰國與歐共體爭端的原因
As globalization enhances and capital and labour continue to find less barriers for its movement, trade relationships strengthens. With this strengthening, it comes uninvited disputes as markets and nations try to protect their domestic businesses and seek maximum profit from international markets through trade tariff imposition. Since there is always an imbalance in the commodities exchanged between nations, their economic status and financial health, there are disputes that are inevitable and shall continue to force the World Trade Organization (WTO) to continue to act as a neutral party for resolving such conflicts.
Thailand’s top three canned tuna export partners are the US, the EC and Canada. The EC had signed comprehensive canned tuna trade agreements with the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP), which was executed on ratified on 3rd February 2000. However, as ACP countries enjoyed zero tariff on their canned tuna exports to the EC, Thailand was subjected to 24% import tariff by the EC . This seemed discriminatory, as there was no valid and justifiable reason for the EC to hurt Thailand’s economy which was dependent on tuna exports, especially when ACP countries were not imposed any tariff by the EC. The move of imposing tariff on Thailand’s canned tuna exports was discriminatory and Thailand sought support under WTO guidelines through the negotiation channel.
Thailand utilised the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) prescribed by the WTO guidelines, and this procedure helped Thailand secure its justice. The DSU provides conciliation, mediation and neutral outlook to the dispute, which was sought by Thailand and EC was obliged to come to the table to revert its discriminatory move.
