论文代写：
风险和回报评估
在英国建筑行业,潜在的进入者和竞争者是至关重要的,尤其是当公司经营工业和基础设施行业。他们需要人力和设备,必须遵守安全规程。所有这些需求是重要的国际公司的进入壁垒建筑业,但现有的玩家可以正常运行。替代产品或服务的威胁还相当普遍,如实地基础设施的活动。买家和供应商的议价能力是受到相同因素的影响。他们是正在进行的项目数量在英国市场和明显的突出和准备工作为一个特定的客户端(Burtonshaw-Gunn,2008)。
比较这两家公司之间的竞争,大富翁有更多的竞争从落石和Durkan落石全球提供范围广泛的服务在不同的国家,Durkan各领域提供服务。
建筑公司comparativelyundercapitalized比其余的英国经济将公司财务失败的风险更多和限制他们的能力投资商业模式需要注入的资本(我和穆雷,2013)。这是更多的一级资本。在这里,大富翁和落石都视为二级公司应收账款天数比债权人天。然而,Durkan发现一级公司拥有更多数量的债权人天比应收账款天数。因此,大富翁和落石都视为高风险公司,但是他们的同龄人相比,风险较低。考虑大富翁和岩石之间的风险下降,落石比大富翁有更多的风险,因为它已经在更多的国家全球业务。
Evaluation of Risks and Rewards
In the UK construction industry, the potential entrants and competitors are crucial, especially when the firms operate in industrial and infrastructure sectors. They need manpower as well as equipment and have to follow safety procedures.All these requirements are significant barriers to the entry of international companies to the construction industry, but the existing players can operate normally. The threat of substitute products or services is also quite common like site-based infrastructure activities. The bargaining power of buyers and suppliers is influenced by same factors. They are the number of projects that are being undertaken within the UK market and the apparent prominence and readiness to work for a specific client(Burtonshaw-Gunn, 2008).
Comparing the competition among the firms, Midas has more competition from Rock Fall and Durkan as Rock Fall offers wide range of services in various countries globally and Durkan offers services in various sectors.
Construction firms are comparativelyundercapitalized than the rest of the UK economy which puts firms at more risk of financial failure and confines their ability to invest in business models requiring injections of capital(Ive and Murray, 2013). This is more in case of Tier 1 capital. Here, both Midas and Rock Fall are considered as Tier 2 firms as their debtor days are much more than creditor days. Yet, Durkan is found to be Tier 1 firm having more number of creditor days than debtor days. Hence, both Midas and Rock Fall are considered as high risk firms, yet their risk is low compared to their peer group. Considering the risk between Midas and Rock Fall, Rock Fall has more risk than Midas as it has global operations in more countries.
