人们普遍认为中国引人注目的经济增长已经隆起由于私营部门的快速物质化(Yueh,2008)。中国被认为是那些非常创业的国家之一。根据全球创业观察(GEM),广泛引用和巴布森学院出版,中国站在集团的国家宝石积极调查。宝石的研究人员也认为,中国不能称为创新经济迄今为止;然而,经济是由效率,这是一个优势经济,这是由因素(黄,2010)。
这种广泛的增长,还有其他的观点,提出了需要研究。不同的分析师,中国内部以及外部,不把中国经济的成功和它的创业精神。他们相信外国直接投资,政府和巨大的基础设施建设,为主要的激增的中国经济向前发展。私营部门的发展是一次又一次地观察到作为附录,形容事情发生,因为中国经济的成功,而不是其原因。另一个难题是找到的原因,中国企业家需要如此精力充沛。理解这些问题有着巨大的影响。在过去的几年里,在西方主要经济体已经陷入金融危机,失业率高企,经济增长缓慢。发展中国家正在中国若有所思地指导(巴蒂尔,2010)。
同样重要的是要理解中国企业的类型。这两种类型的创业追赶创业企业家和前沿。创业的各种索赔从政治制度不同的东西。追赶创业与复制的活动。这些活动是由一些捏造的,现在是模仿,形成有竞争力的成本。最大的中国企业家属于这种类型的创业精神。的主要贡献,他们给经济创造就业,而不是技术和科学的进步。这并不意味着它不是重要的创造就业机会;本质上仍然是至关重要的(省,2011)。
It is widely believed that the noteworthy economic growth of China has come to eminence due to the rapid materialization of private sector (Yueh, 2008). China is considered to be one of those countries which are extremely entrepreneurial. As per Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), which is cited extensively and is a Babson College publishing, China stands amongst the group of countries that GEM favourably surveys. The researchers in GEM also believe that China cannot be called as innovative economy so far; however, the economy is driven by efficiency, which is an edge over economies, which are driven by factors (Huang, 2010).
With this extensive growth, there are other perspectives that are presented and are required to be researched. Various analysts, inside as well as outside China, do not correlate the economic success of China with its entrepreneurship. They give credit to the foreign direct investment, the government and enormous construction of the infrastructure, as the main grounds of forward surge of the economy of China. The development of private sector is time and again observed as an addendum, described as something that took place because of success of Chinese economy, rather than being its cause. The other dilemma is to find out the reason that the Chinese entrepreneurship is required to be so energetic. Understanding these problems has enormous implications. In last few years, the principal economies in the West have been caught up in financial misery, high unemployment, and slow growth. The developing countries are looking up to China thoughtfully for guidance (Shane, 2010).
It is also important to understand the type of Chinese entrepreneurship. The two types of entrepreneurship are catch-up entrepreneurship and frontier entrepreneurship. Both the kinds of entrepreneurship claim diverse things from a political system. The catch-up entrepreneurship connects with activities that are replicative. These activities are ones which are made-up by some and now are imitated and shaped at competitive costs. Maximum Chinese entrepreneurs belong to this type of entrepreneurship. The chief contribution that they give to the economy is creation of job, instead of making advancement in technology and science. This does not mean that it is not important to create jobs; it is still essentially vital (Province, 2011).
