For case in point, in Iceland, the yearly figure of visitors is higher than the figure of populace.
A number of reports and researches do caution us that there may be a connection being there of human being and uproar to Polar Regions wildlife. Current organic study regarding diseases of Polar Regions wildlife has cautiously recognized an extensive variety of likely disease creating creatures in Polar Region fauna (The World Science Tech, 2010). A major worry is that human being may send out vital pathogens between flora and fauna in this natural region. Whilst visiting wildlife locations, travelers march among crowd of flora and fauna (Curry et al., 2001). The evaluation of environmental effects of tourists and their movements in the Polar Regions is in its infancy, although there are some promising initiatives. Without a doubt, this is an issue of serious concern for the reason that if tourism movements are not dealt with effectively, the effects might not be correctly regarded and might cause intolerable dangers to ecological system, theoretically legally watched over by global agreement. Even though the effects of tourism on the Polar Regions are found primarily as environmental, large concerns as well exist in relation to the effects of tourism (Splettstoesser, 2004).
Conclusion
If Polar Regions’ tourism seeks to be sustainable, government and industry necessitate recognizing and putting together local facts into the planning course of action.
为例子，在冰岛，游客每年的数字比大众的人物。
做警示我们，可能有一个连接有人和喧嚣的极地地区的野生动物数量的报告和研究。目前关于有机研究极地地区的野生动物疾病曾谨慎地认可可能的疾病在极地动物生物创造广泛的各种（世界科学技术，2010）。一个主要的担心是，人类可以发出重要的病原体的植物群和动物群之间的这种自然区。虽然参观野生动物的位置，旅行者三月植物和动物的人群（咖喱等人。，2001）。对游客和他们在极地地区的运动环境影响评价还处于起步阶段，虽然有一些有前途的措施。毫无疑问，这是一个问题的严重关注的原因，如果旅游运动不是有效的处理，效果可能不正确，可能会导致无法忍受的是危害生态系统理论，法律上观看了由全球协议。尽管旅游业对北极地区的影响主要存在的环境，大企业也存在对旅游业的影响（施普勒特施特塞尔，2004）。
结论
如果北极地区旅游的目的是可持续的，政府和行业需要识别和放在一起的地方事实为行动规划课程。
