Rapid critical appraisal of Randomized controlled trials (RCT) is another essential skill for evidence-based practice. With respect to such appraisal of an RCT, Mazurek Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2005) have developed a checklist that seems to be very helpful. After conducting a critical appraisal and backing the practice by several rigorous evidences, practice must be weighed against different criteria such as clinical support, theoretical soundness, and potential for harm, empirical support and documentation. However, clinician’s individual knowledge and expertise is given more value and weight in the absence of rigorous evidence. Generally, evidence is ranked according to its scientific strength, concern with patient care and improvement in the quality of patient’s life (Geddes, 1999 and Roberts & Yeager, 2004).
快速评价随机对照试验（RCT）是循证实践的另一个重要的技能。针对RCT这样的评价，这fineout Mazurek梅力刻和（2005）已经制定了一个清单，似乎是很有帮助的。在进行批判性评价和支持实践的几个严格的证据，实践必须与不同的标准，如临床支持理论的可靠性，重量，和潜在的危害，实证支持和文件。然而，临床医生的个人知识和专长是在严格的证据没有给予更多的价值和重量。一般来说，证据是根据其科技实力排名，病人护理和患者的生活质量改善的关注（Geddes，1999和罗伯茨Yeager，2004）。
