paper代写：税收政策的利用
是一个长期争论的事实如果低劣商品的广告被征税或多或他们应该完全被禁止。也许,政府已经完全禁止他们的原因是,它似乎很伪君子在屏幕上有一个商业卖香烟而下展示了政府赞助广告,建议人们远离它。类似的政府,可以练习负面广告,这将最有可能说服人们远离并强调香烟的危害,酒精或毒品。这必然会产生负面影响需求曲线和把它离开了。
同时,经济上,需求萎缩的需求可以通过收缩曲线进行课税,提高价格和供给曲线转向左边。税收相当于边际外部成本应该实施这样一个,这是社会最优,可以实现。然而在实践中,一个精确的货币价值难以到达,来遏制这种商品的消费。监管是很少的影响完全消除自产品的需求然后通常由隐藏或非官方市场在这些情况下。空间限制,这在本质上是不太严重的,也有时有助于监管控制。
paper代写：税收政策的利用
There is a long-standing debate over the fact if the advertisements of de-merit goods be taxed more or they should entirely be banned. Perhaps, the reason why government has totally banned them is that it would seem very hypocrite on screen where there is one commercial selling cigarette while the next showcases government sponsored advertisement, advising people to stay away from it. The government, on the similar lines can practice negative advertisement, which will most likely persuade people to stay away from it and emphasize on the dangers of cigarettes, alcohol or addictive drugs. This is bound to negatively impact the demand curve and shift it left.
Also, economically, a contraction in demand can be achieved by contraction of demand curve subjected to imposition of tax, raising the prices and shifting the supply curve to the left. A tax equivalent of marginal external cost should be imposed so that an out, which is socially optimum, can be achieved. In practice, however, an accurate monetary value is difficult to arrive at, to curb the consumption of such goods. The impact of regulation is rarely complete to eliminate the demand since the product is then usually driven by the hidden or unofficial market in these cases. Spatial restrictions, which are less severe in nature, are also sometimes helpful in regulatory control.
