Assignment First

商业文章代写:公司法第181-183条对TPCL的适用性

该法第181条规定,董事必须诚实地履行其职责。《2001年公司法》(Cth)第181-183条规定的责任适用于Pool Company Ltd (TPCL)。这是因为它是一家有限公司,所有拥有一名或多名董事的有限公司都必须遵守《公司法2001 (Cth)》(“章程和可替代规则| ASIC -澳大利亚证券和投资委员会”,2016)第181-183条的规定。尽管公司不采用宪法,但通过ASIC的默示治理和《2001年公司法》(Cth),如ASIC诉Adler (2002) 41 ACSR 72,该规约规则适用于公司董事。代表了部分的适用性的问题对公司而不是公司的董事,它是适用于部分回答说,公司董事会的欠公司的诚信和忠诚义务的方式采取行动提高了公司的利润和进步。


商业文章代写 :公司法第181-183条对TPCL的适用性

第183条规定,董事不得利用其职位为个人利益谋取利益,及/或对公司造成任何形式的损害。从案例研究和迈克尔·勃朗特的行为来看,这一节显然适用于公司。第183条(“公司法2001 -第183条信息使用-民事义务”,2016年)限制董事使用任何内部或任何类型的信息以获取个人利益或通过董事的行为使他人受益。这显然适用于审视迈克尔•勃朗特(Michael Bronte)行为的公司。


商业文章代写 :公司法第181-183条对TPCL的适用性

Section 181 of the act states that the directors must discharge their duties with good faith. The duties in the section 181-183 of the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) do apply to The Pool Company Ltd (TPCL). This is because it is a limited company and all limited with either one or more directors must be governed by section 181-183 of the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth)(“Constitution and replaceable rules | ASIC – Australian Securities and Investments Commission”, 2016). Even though a corporation does not adopt a constitution, the statute rules are applicable to the company directors by way of implied governance of ASIC and the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth), for example ASIC v Adler (2002) 41 ACSR 72. The question represents the applicability of the sections to the company rather than the directors of the company, to which it is replied that the sections applies to the directors of the company who owe the corporation a duty of good faith and loyalty to act in a manner that enhances the corporation’s profits and progress.


商业文章代写 :公司法第181-183条对TPCL的适用性

Section 183 states that a director must not use his or her position to gain advantage for personal gain, and/or cause detriment of any kind to the corporation. Looking at the case study and the acts of Michael Bronte, it seems this section clearly apply to the corporation. Section 183(“CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 – SECT 183 Use of information–civil obligations”, 2016) restricts the director to use any internal or any kind of information to gain personal advantage or to have someone else take advantage by the director’s action. This clearly applies to the corporation looking at the act of Michael Bronte.