商业文章代写：物理程序处理的B1和B2框架
这个框架对基础、接收器、组合目标Ml和M2、分支目标B1、CPU、处理器1和处理器2有物理过程。每一次通信都描述了从一个物理过程开始到下一个物理过程的任务交换。可行性财产保持联系，因为没有任何物理程序可以无限制地构建其行为。在B1, B2的概率选择不会带来任何麻烦，因为B1和B2的贡献直到周期(t)决定它们的收益率直到周期t(然而收益率在不同的情况下可能是不同的，可以从概率环境推断)。我们可以合理地期望每个处理器在处理任务时都投入非零周期。沿着这些思路，框架同样具有一致性。这就结束了我们使用物理框架对可验证框架建模的交换。
一个分散的框架由有限数量的程序和协调模式组成，这些模式与一些程序集相结合(Misra, 1983)。为了从物理程序中识别这些程序，我们称它们为合法程序。每一个合法的程序都可能执行连续的代码和两个例外的调用:发送和接收。在传输中，合法的过程将活动模式和要通过该模式传递的通信命名为活动模式。传输的实现使通信保存在预定的活动模式上;记者接着继续执行它的指示。每一封信函都要形成一段自信而又有限的时间来达到它的目的。在直拨电话旁边传送的通信按其传送方式传送。在接收模式中，合法的过程从希望接收消息的模式中指定单个或额外的可访问模式。一个合法的程序想要获得可能需要等待一个通信接触基地旁边的接近模式之一(达尔，1970年)。通信约定在很大程度上是直接的，可以在许多当前的机器结构上实现。在计算过程中，如果大部分附带条件符合下列条件，则合法程序的安排迟早会陷入僵局:
1)每一个合法程序在死锁中要么等待get要么结束;
2)不少于一个合法程序(proc1)在死锁中被阻止获取;
3)对于任何处于死锁状态的合法程序(proc1)，当它等待从某个合法程序(proc1)获得时，合法程序(proc2)也处于死锁状态，并且从合法程序(proc2)到合法程序(proc1)之间没有通信。在此之后，死锁中的任何合法程序都不会完成额外的计算，因为它们将彼此保持观望。
商业文章代写 ：物理程序处理的B1和B2框架
This framework has physical procedures for the foundation, the sink, combined targets Ml and M2, branch targets B1, the CPU, processor 1, and processor 2. Every communication depicts the exchange of a task starting with one physical process then onto the next. The feasibility possessions stay connected as no physical procedure constructs its conduct with respect to suspicion without bounds. Probabilistic choices at B1, B2 bring no trouble as the contributions to B1, B2 till the period (t) decide their yields till period t (however the yields might be distinctive at various occasions inferable from the probabilistic environment). We can reasonably expect that every processor invests non-zero period in handling a task. Along these lines, the framework likewise has the consistency goods. This finishes up our exchange of utilizing physical frameworks to model certifiable frameworks.
A scattered framework comprises of a limited number of procedures and coordinated modes interfacing a few sets of procedures (Misra, 1983). To recognize these procedures from physical procedures, we call them legitimate procedures. Every legitimate procedure might carry out consecutive code and two exceptional summonses: sending & receiving. Within a transmission, a legitimate procedure names an active mode and a correspondence that is to be delivered through that mode. Implementation of the transmit leads to the correspondence being saved on the destined active mode; the correspondent then continues with the carrying out of its signs. Every correspondence forms a self-assertive however limited period to achieve its target. Correspondences transmitted next to a direct are conveyed in the arrangement in which they are transmitted. In a receiver mode, a legitimate procedure names single or extra accessible mode from some of one it wishes to receive messages with. A legitimate procedure with a desire to get might need to hold up waiting a correspondence touches base next to one of the approaching modes (Dahl, 1970). The correspondence convention is to a great degree straightforward and can be actualized on numerous current machine structures. An arrangement of legitimate procedures is gridlocked sooner or later in the calculation if the greater part of the accompanying conditions holds:
1) Each legitimate procedure in deadlock is either holding up to get or is ended;
2) No less than one legitimate procedure (proc1) in deadlock is holding up to get;
3) For any legitimate procedure (proc1) in deadlock that is holding up to get from some legitimate procedure (proc1), legitimate procedure (proc2) is additionally in deadlock, and there is no correspondence in travel from legitimate procedure (proc2) to legitimate procedure (proc1). It takes after then that not any of the legitimate procedures in Deadlock will complete an additional calculation as they will stay sitting tight for one another.
