As the Director of the Company are more curious to have the continuous control over the Company and want to minimize public scrutiny and if in any option discussed above, is availed by the Company which requires the Company to convert into the public one then the purpose/objective of the Director is defeated, hence the option which requires the conversion of the Company from private into public one is not good form the Directors’ point of view, thus is almost useless to recommend or even discuss.
However First option would be the suitable one as the Directors want as it don’t require the company to covert it into the public that automatically results in minimizing the public scrutiny that is first motive of the Director of the company . it may be noted that first option recommends to raise further share capital that technically means to increase the capital ( as in private company that cannot be raised from the public by giving them the status of members ) however that can be raised from the public as deposit or loan by giving the status to them as creditors of the Company then after it may raise the capital of the Company that will help the company to finance the viable project of the company and to get the return thereon , however in this case it may be noted that the required return from the project should be more then cost of Capital( debt) otherwise option will be of no use . Cost of Capital generally will be the interest payable to the Creditor in turn of proving the finance/loan to the company. Following are the things that to be kept in mind while using this option—
1- Debt equity ratio is required to be maintained ideally it should be 2:1.( i.e. debt should not be more than twice of the capital of the Company)
2- Creditors should be unsecured one.
If Company uses this option then it will exclusively participate in the net earnings of the Company however it would have raise the fund form the public by way of being conversion into public then it would require to allow the new members to participate in this earning however in present case it will only give the interest to the creditor not the earning.
作为公司的董事，更想在公司连续控制，要尽量减少公众的监督，如果在任何选项以上讨论，利用公司，要求公司转换到公共然后导演的目的/目的是失败的，因此，选择需要的公司从私人转化为公众是不好的形式董事会的观点，因此几乎是无用的建议或讨论。
但是第一个选择是适合作为董事会希望它不要求公司将其转化为市民，在减少公众的监督，是该公司的董事的最初动机是自动的结果。可以指出的是，第一个选项，建议进一步提高股本的技术手段来增加资本（如私营公司不能从公众给予他们成员的状态）然而，可以提高从公众存款或贷款给他们的身份作为公司的债权人之后它可以提高公司，将有助于公司公司的可行的项目融资和得到的回报的资本，但在这种情况下，它可能需要指出的是，所要求的回报率从项目应超过资本成本（债务）否则选项将是没有用的。资本成本通常会在证明金融/贷款公司向债权人支付的利息。下面是要牢记在使用此选项的东西—
1债务股本比需要保持最理想的应该是2:1。（即债务不应超过公司资本的两倍）
2应无担保的债权人。
如果公司使用这个选项，然后将只参与公司的净利润却会筹集资金的形式公开的方式被转换成公共那么可能需要允许新成员参与收益而在目前的情况下，这只会给感兴趣的债权人不赚钱。
