英国伦敦城市大学论文代写：劳动权
界定劳动权是非常重要的。劳动权被称为与劳动者的具体角色有关的权利。一些权利是已知的行使个人的基础上，其他的集体方式（后2001）。这些可以包括对工作中自由选择工作，对工作有公平的条件下，这可能会导致包括问题多元化为隐私被保护或只是工资；一个被保护免受不合理的任意解雇权；一个属于权利，被贸易联盟代表，或使罢工权。这些权利被称为基础的一些不同的基础基地，如能力，尊严，或自由。因此，需要注意的是，劳动权是人权的重要（也等于规定2004）。这应该是相同的情况下，可口可乐以及。基于这些信息，可以说，在哥伦比亚可口可乐网站的工人没有得到人权，因此，这证明了需要遵循人权的道德理论。
从实证主义的角度来看，可以说，人权条约被实证主义者列为保护劳动权利，或任何其他文件侧重于明确承认劳动权利的形式，人权作为一个点开始。如果有法律的充分支持，那么答案是肯定的，劳动权作为人权（瑞秋2008）。基于这一视角，描述在全球社区劳动权利能力，这是考虑以决定划分在不同类别的人的权利的法律保护是很重要的，通过识别在多个不同的保护级别。然而，实证主义的路径不能被认为是适当的描述劳动人权条约。对工具理性的方法相关的根是众所周知的谎言在马克思主义的传统（罗斯2009）。该展示工人声称人权必须是来自利用潜在的强有力的合法的方法来说服他们声称的安全利益的渴望，以及感知要求使用这些工具和论证自己的雇主愿意回应。
英国伦敦城市大学论文代写：劳动权
It is important for defining the rights of labour. Rights of labour are known to be entitlements in relation with the specific role in order to be a worker. Some of the rights are known to be exercised on individual basis and the others in a collective manner (Post 2001). These can be including the right of working in a job chosen freely, a right to have fair conditions at work, which may result in encompassing the issues being diversified as privacy being protected or just wage; a right for being protected from unjustified and arbitrary dismissal; a right for belonging to, and being represented by the union of trade, or a right of making a strike. These rights are known to be the base for a number of different foundational bases like capability, dignity, or freedom. Hence, it is important to note that labour rights are also equal to human rights (Provis 2004). This should have been the same in the case of Coca Cola as well. Based on this information, it can be stated that workers at the sites Coca Cola in Columbia were not being given human rights and hence, this justifies the need for following the ethical theory of human rights.
Considering the perspective of positivism, it can be stated that treaties of human rights have been listed by positivist for the protection of labour right, or any other document focusing on explicit recognition labour rights in the form of human rights as a point to begin with. If there is sufficient support from law, then the answer is positive that labour rights should be treated as human rights (Rachels 2008). Based on this perspective, it is important for describing the lawful protection that there is affordability of labour rights in global community and this is considered for taking decisions on dividing the rights of humans in different categories, by their recognition in a number of different levels of protection. However, the path of positivism cannot be considered as appropriate for describing the treaty of labour rights with human rights. The roots related to the approach of instrumentalism are known to lie within the tradition of Marxism (Ross 2009). The imperative for presenting the claims of workers as human rights is known to be coming from the desire for utilizing the potentially strong lawful methods to secure advantage for persuading their claims, as well as from the perceived requirement for responding to the willingness of employers for using these tools and arguments themselves.