英国论文：应急领导人对组织领导的有用性
应急领导人将更成功地规划本组织的活动，以一种更符合现实和更接近确定性的方式。然而，如果一位应急领导人能够带领组织度过艰难时期，我们不确定这是否是唯一的选择，但与此相反，一些组织在大多数人看来根本不可能的情况下处于更有利的地位。例如，对于金融咨询集团的一位领导者来说，其他所有人都面临衰退的时候，可能是增长和聚集更多客户、实现利润的最佳时机。这一点更为显著，而那些只专注于带领公司度过艰难时期的临时领导者，可能已经错过了增长的机会。因此，应急领导者是领导者的一个重要要求，但仅仅停留在特定的特征上，很可能会使领导者在逆境中错失机会。
Yukl和Mahsud(2010)认为，领导者必须灵活应变，适应新的情况和环境，为组织可能发生的所有事件做好准备，这是非常重要的。毕竟，所有的行动并不总是基于特定的理论，但是领导者的许多行动都是直觉的和自发的，这在任何理论中都没有提到。因此，更重要的是对现在持开放的态度，接受现实，并为所有事件做好准备，在需要的时候做出必要的调整。在这里，领导者必须愿意让追随者或团队进行改变和调整。因此，一个始终与现实保持一致的领导者了解基本情况，并做出伦理和道德决策，他可能会有最少的误判。
英国论文 ：应急领导人对组织领导的有用性
A contingent leader will be more successful in planning the events of the organisation in a way which is more appropriate with reality and closer to certainty. However, if a contingent leader is able to guide the organisation through difficult times, it is not sure whether that was the only option, but in contrast, some organisations are better placed in situations which look broadly impossible for most. For example, for a leader in the financial advisory group, the time when all others are facing the recession may be the best time for growing and gathering more clients and register profits. This is more phenomenal and the contingent leader who is only probably focused on taking the organisation through the tough times may have missed the opportunity to grow. Thus, the contingent leader is an important requirement for leaders, but being only stuck on specific characteristics will probably make the leader miss the opportunity in adversity.
Yukl and Mahsud (2010) suggest that it is very much essential for leaders to be flexible and adaptable to new situations and circumstances so as to be ready for all possible eventualities for the organisation. After all, all kinds of actions are not always based on specific theories, but many actions of a leader are intuitive and spontaneous which has no mention in any of the theories. Thus, it is more important to be open about the present, accept the reality, and makes one ready for all events and make necessary adjustments where required. Here the leader must be willing to make the followers or the team as well undertake changes and adjustments. Thus, a leader who is always one with the reality understands the basics and makes ethical and moral decisions may possibly have the least number of misjudgements.
