Assignment First

英国诺丁汉论文代写:BP石油泄漏

本文进一步继续描述的相似之处和差异在漏油事件的行为,双方的不同方面的法律,然后得出结论:国际需要改进使其更全面的(朔恩保姆,2012)。

由Gossling在另一篇文章中,他谈到的合法性环境,构建过程,失去然后再次修理它。这次讨论主要集中英国石油公司深水地平线事件。本文还考虑,英国石油公司用于发布企业社会责任文件,但实际上它并没有实践文档中提到的东西。它继续问为什么BP最初绿色的努力被人欣赏和接受,然后它只不过是显示绿色洗涤(希克斯,2010)。

本文讨论合法性可以描述为社会建设上形成人与公司有关的行为以及行为。然后描述了合法性与CSR活动以及如何在最近组织一直在危害社会,从而具有挑战性的合法性理论。作者说,合法性理论在企业社会责任可以被视为道德合法性。作者接着谈论企业环境及其作者不同的解释的合法性。

公司都受到不同的压力和合规管理的一种方式,使公司实现企业社会责任。还在公众的印象大多是局限于由该公司通过媒体沟通。因此,许多利益相关者的却没有得到多少有关公司的信息与企业社会责任有关的活动(谢勒&宫殿2011)。

英国诺丁汉论文代写:BP石油泄漏

However, USA which has significant maritime operation chose not be a part of this liability and instead formed its own laws to punish the firms who were responsible for the oil spill. The US laws for the oil spill was created in the year 1990 post the incident of Exxon Valdez.

The article further goes on to describe the similarities and the differences in both the acts for the oil spill, the different aspects of both the laws and then concludes that international needs to be improved to make it more comprehensive (Schoenbaum, 2012).

In another article by Gossling, he talks about the legitimacy of the environment, it building process, losing and then again repairing it. This discussion mainly focuses the Deepwater Horizon incident of BP. The article also takes into consideration that BP used to publish its corporate social responsibility document, but in reality it did not practice the things mentioned in the document. It goes on to ask the question as why initially BP green efforts were appreciated and accepted by the people and then later it was revealed that it was nothing but green washing (Hicks, 2010).

The article talks about legitimacy which can describe as social construct which is formed on the people related to a firm actions as well as behaviors. He then describes how legitimacy is related to the CSR activities and how in the recent times the organizations have been acting against the society and thereby challenging the legitimacy theory. The author says that the legitimacy theory in CSR can be interpreted as the moral legitimacy. The author then goes on to talk about the corporate environment legitimacy and their different interpretations by the authors.

Firms are subjected to different pressures and the compliance can be one of the ways to make the firm implement the corporate social responsibility. Also the impression in the public is mostly limited to communication done by the firm through the media. As a result, many of the stakeholders do not get much information about the firm activities related to CSR (Scherer & Palazzo 2011).