Assignment First

英国硕士论文:社会控制或社会关系的问题分析

无数的哲学思考可靠地阐明了为什么个人会做错事,或者发现了驱使个人做错事和滥用社会标准的最具说服力的变量是什么。相反,社会控制假说到目前为止已经被人们所接受,可以想象人们正在进行不法行为。此外,社会控制或社会关系假说强调了为什么男人不是罪犯。在社会控制学者的怀疑中,人们有无视法律而不遵守法律的能力。行为端正不是个人的行为。个人做错事的理由是,社会的力量或义务不够充分。它描述了个体在偏离和和谐的中间徘徊。它显示了每个人的压力,要么制定退化法案,要么承认这些标准。因此,社会控制学者提出了两个组成部分,以吸引个体再次从异常的一面,特别是关系,责任,素质,标准和信念。家庭和同事聚会变成了影响个人行为的重要办公室。

强调社会环境如何塑造个体,使其成为流浪狗。(在任何情况下,他都没有具体说明是什么样的限制和控制阻止了年轻人的流动。)在波格的假设中,他提出了四种主要的“社会纽带”,可以决定一个人是否有不当行为,具体包括联系、责任、贡献和信念。人际关系包括人与人之间的关系和热情的纽带,特别是人与人之间和教育者之间。责任指的是青少年如何利用时间、活力、努力,以习惯的方式来进步,例如,为未来节省金钱和放弃高学习能力。贡献意味着一个人在那些传统的活动中,例如学校、娱乐和家庭中的联系程度。由于社会将定期分享基本的良好价值观,按照这些原则,一个人的信念是必不可少的。如果这些道德品质是逃学或衰弱的,个人就会更容易地进行犯罪行为。

说白了,Pogge假说和研磨的概念强调所有个人甚至国家潜在的参与者积极尝试减少贫困,尽管如此,个人将适应标准或符合法律,因为他们不愿意破坏与他人结合。对于Pogge的GRD实现有几个反应。首先,正如对它的怀疑所表明的,社会控制学者认为人类是潜在的违法者。考虑一下年轻人做坏事的可能性,因为他们是在娱乐。另一个问题是,这样的假设无法解释群体不当行为和成年人罪责的原因。此外,大多数的研究都涉及到非犯罪青少年的轻微犯罪。

尽管如此,在如今这个边缘不再那么重要的时代,不法行为正变得更加无国界。今天,许多国家相互联系,许多国家都受到侵犯,例如药物和人口贩运或非法的自然生命交换。首先,有人认为犯罪学必须超越国家。在借鉴各类跨国不法行为的基础上,将全文作为样本进行论述和论述。此外,跨国不法行为的性质将进行调查,并着重强调本论文的基本高级药物贩运。写作作为本文的一部分,通常使用的是英国和美国,但是也使用了来自世界各地的各种分布。


英国硕士论文 :社会控制或社会关系的问题分析

Numerous philosophical speculations dependably clarify why do individuals carry out wrongdoing, or to discover what are the most compelling variables propel individuals perpetrate wrongdoing and abuse the social standards. Rather, social control hypothesis have been as of now accepted people are conceivably carrying out wrongdoing. Additionally, the social control or social bond hypothesis is accentuating why a man don’t be a criminal. In social control scholars’ suspicions, people have the ability to disregard the laws instead of comply with the laws. Well behaved practices are not the way of individuals. Individuals perpetrate wrongdoing on the grounds that the strengths or obliges of society is not most grounded enough. It depicts individuals are remaining in the quandary in the middle of aberrance and congruity. It demonstrates the pressure of everybody either confer degenerate act or acknowledges the standards. Hence, social control scholars propose a couple of components to draw individuals once again from the side of abnormality, particularly relationship, responsibilities, qualities, standards, and convictions. Family and associate gathering turn into essential offices that influence individuals’ behaviour.
Underlining how social conditions shape individuals turn into a stray. (In any case, he did not specify about what sorts of limitations and control that keep youths from floating.) In Pogge’s hypothesis, he proposed four primary ‘social bonds’ that could decide one’s inclusion in misconduct, specifically connection, duty, contribution, and conviction. Connection contains the interpersonal and enthusiastic bonds among others, particularly folks and educators. Duty alludes to how adolescents make utilization of the time, vitality, exertion used in customary way of progress, for example, sparing cash for the future and abstaining a high scholastic capability. Contribution implies the level of one’s association in those traditional exercises, for example, school, diversion, and family. Because society will share basic good values regularly, along these lines, convictions of a man are essential. Individuals may all the more effortlessly carry out criminal act if these ethical qualities are truant or debilitated.
To put it plainly, Pogge’s hypothesis and the idea of GRD accentuated all individuals and even the countries to be potential participants in active attempts to reduce poverty, be that as it may, individuals will accommodate the standard or comply with the law since they would prefer not to devastate the bonding with others. There is couple of reactions on Pogge’s GRD’s implementation. In the first place, as indicated by the suspicion of it, social control scholars expected human are potential law-violators. Consider the possibility that the young people carry out wrongdoing since they are entertaining. Another issue is that such hypotheses can’t be clarified the reasons for pack wrongdoing and grown-up culpability. Besides, most studies were involved in the inclusion of paltry offenses of non-delinquent adolescents.
Be that as it may, in today’s age where fringes are less essential, wrongdoing is additionally getting to be borderless. Today, numerous nations are interconnected and numerous nations are included in violations, for example, medications and human trafficking or unlawful natural life exchange. Firstly, it will be contended that criminology must move past the country state. In reference to various types of transnational wrongdoing will be made all through the paper as samples and delineation of a contention. Additionally, the nature of transnational wrongdoing will be investigated, with heavier accentuation on this present paper’s fundamental premium medication trafficking. Writing utilized as a part of this paper is generally British and American, however various distributions from around the globe have likewise been utilized.