The devotion of parliamentarians are presently focused on the issues related to risk in Norway and Sweden for about three times more than their focus in the initial half years of 1960s reflecting within the private bills that they submitted. There were various attempts made in controlling the considerable situation that was increasing growing because of the unexpected technological opposition . It was then asserted by Sowby (1965) that risk related comparisons are essential to make. The risk of driving car, smoking and utilization of public transportation are highly greater than the risk associated with residing nearby a plant of nuclear power. However, this approach devised did not receive much immediate attention in increasing the public will, to acknowledge and accept risk of technology. This did not come as a surprise .
Therefore, risks were investigated comprehensively and identified that the societal acceptance to the risk was present to an extent that was its association with the benefits and voluntary as per Starr (1969). The work of Starr increased the interest within the management of risk and emergence of interest in determination of public perception, tolerance and acceptance of the risks . The perception of risk was then considered to be a challenge for making rational decisions as public viewed the risks in a situation where there were no presence of risks as per the concerning researchers. The conflict among the public and expert perception of risk is based on the social confusion of managing the risk. The formation of the perception in relation to a risk cannot work alone, neither it cannot be effective nor it can result into success for risk management.