Assignment First

英国心理学论文代写:风险感知和管理的关系分析

议员们的奉献精神目前集中于挪威和瑞典境内与风险有关的问题,这比他们在1960年代头半年所集中注意的问题大约多三倍,这反映在他们提交的私人法案中。在控制由于意外的技术反对而日益增长的相当大的局势方面作出了各种尝试。Sowby(1965)认为风险相关的比较是必不可少的。开车、吸烟和使用公共交通的风险远远大于居住在核电站附近的风险。但是,在提高公众承认和接受技术风险的意愿方面,所设计的这一方法并没有立即得到多少注意。这并不奇怪。


英国心理学论文代写 :风险感知和管理的关系分析

因此,我们对风险进行了全面的调查,并确定了社会对风险的接受程度,即它与利益和自愿性之间的联系(Starr(1969))。斯塔尔的工作增加了风险管理内部的利益,并出现了确定公众对风险的感知、容忍和接受的利益。根据相关研究人员的说法,当公众在不存在风险的情况下看待风险时,对风险的感知被认为是做出理性决策的挑战。公众与专家对风险认知的冲突是基于风险管理的社会混乱。与风险相关的知觉的形成不能单独起作用,它既不能是有效的,也不能导致风险管理的成功。


英国心理学论文代写 :风险感知和管理的关系分析

The devotion of parliamentarians are presently focused on the issues related to risk in Norway and Sweden for about three times more than their focus in the initial half years of 1960s reflecting within the private bills that they submitted. There were various attempts made in controlling the considerable situation that was increasing growing because of the unexpected technological opposition . It was then asserted by Sowby (1965) that risk related comparisons are essential to make. The risk of driving car, smoking and utilization of public transportation are highly greater than the risk associated with residing nearby a plant of nuclear power. However, this approach devised did not receive much immediate attention in increasing the public will, to acknowledge and accept risk of technology. This did not come as a surprise .


英国心理学论文代写 :风险感知和管理的关系分析

Therefore, risks were investigated comprehensively and identified that the societal acceptance to the risk was present to an extent that was its association with the benefits and voluntary as per Starr (1969). The work of Starr increased the interest within the management of risk and emergence of interest in determination of public perception, tolerance and acceptance of the risks . The perception of risk was then considered to be a challenge for making rational decisions as public viewed the risks in a situation where there were no presence of risks as per the concerning researchers. The conflict among the public and expert perception of risk is based on the social confusion of managing the risk. The formation of the perception in relation to a risk cannot work alone, neither it cannot be effective nor it can result into success for risk management.