Polar Regions tourist movement is concerted in the austral summer, all through the time of ice thaw, which represents the propagation seasons of various home-grown species, and this timing contributes considerably to the possibility of environmental spoil (Timothy and Olsen, 2001). Modest empirical confirmation exists, nevertheless, to point out convincingly that tourists have a momentous negative effect on the environmental system of Polar Regions (Splettstoesser, 2000:52). Nowadays, specified the big increase in tourist numbers, a re-calculation of this proportion is desirable. The preventive belief may well be functional in the managing of tourism in Polar Regions. To put it precisely, the belief proposes that methodical improbability must not be a cause to holdup completion of measures to put off environmental damage, and as far as the observable proofs are concerned, so far the action is not apt both from industry and government perspective (Draper and Reed, 2005:24).
A number of studies do caution us that there may be a connection amid human presence and uproar to Polar Regions wildlife. Current organic study regarding diseases of Polar Regions wildlife has cautiously recognized an extensive range of likely disease-causing organisms in Polar Region fauna.
极地地区的旅游活动在南半球的夏季是一致的，都通过冰融化的时候，它代表不同的本土物种的繁殖季节，这一时间大大有助于环境破坏的可能性（Timothy奥尔森，2001）。适度的经验证实存在，然而，指出有说服力，游客在极地地区的环境系统中的一个重大的负面影响（施普勒特施特塞尔，2000:52）。如今，指定的游客人数大幅度增加，这一比例重新计算是可取的。预防信念很可能在极地地区旅游业的管理功能。具体来说，信仰提出了有条不紊的不可能不能使含完成把环境破坏的措施，并尽可观察到的证据而言，到目前为止的行动是不容易从行业和政府的角度（德雷珀Reed，2005:24）。
要警告我们，有可能在人类的存在和喧嚣的极地地区的野生动物的连接数的研究。目前关于有机研究极地地区的野生动物疾病曾谨慎地认可导致极地动物生物疾病的范围广泛的可能。
